FPS logo
Sweeney-Dolls logo
Home
Accent
Business
Church
Classifieds
Sports
School
Deaths
Opinion
News
Forms
Upcoming Events
Area news
Contact
Archive
Letters to the Editor

To the Editor:
In a recent article looking back on the one year since Marc Dann resigned from the Ohio attorney general’s office, The Youngstown Vindicator quoted Representative Mark Okey (D-Carrollton) as saying he “never believed there would be any criminal charges” against Dann.

Okey’s statement was surprising. As a leader of the impeachment efforts against Dann in the Ohio House, he certainly gave the public the impression that Dann had committed criminal acts.

The impeachment resolution, which Okey helped draft, charged that Dann had “obstructed the investigation into the allegations of sexual harassment within his office” and “willfully and intentionally issued misleading statements under oath.” It doesn’t take a lawyer to know that perjury and obstruction of justice are serious crimes.

But now we learn that Okey never really thought Dann was guilty of those acts. In fact, after Dann left office, no one has called for him to be charged with perjury or obstruction of justice. Even the Ohio inspector general’s report, which was a biased hatchet-job on Dann, didn’t accuse him of either act.

Okey’s serious but fraudulent charges were apparently included in the impeachment resolution because the rest of the alleged impeachable acts were so far below the Ohio Constitution’s impeachment standard as to be laughable. He was demagoging an already emotionally charged situation in order to pressure the people’s elected attorney general to leave office.
The Ohio Supreme Court said in 1965: “The people, by their votes, determine their choice of officers, and they should not be robbed of the fruits of such choice for slight or insufficient reasons.” Okey’s reasons for removing Dann were not only slight and insufficient but a sham.

He owes Dann and the public an apology for charging that Dann had committed criminal acts when he now admits he never believed those charges were true. Okey and other House Democrats clearly used dishonest, win-at-all-costs tactics to remove Dann for political reasons.   

Joseph C. Sommer
Attorney at Law
Columbus, OH

<<Back>>


Comment on this story
Before You Post

The Free Press Standard invites you to post your thoughts on the story in the box below.

  • However, before you post, please read these few basic rules.
  • Be appropriate. Posts with obscene, explicit, sexist or racist language will be deleted.
  • Be polite. Posts containing personal attacks, insults, or threats will be deleted.
  • Be honest. Potentially libelous statements will be deleted.
  • Don't 'spam'. Posts advertising or promoting commercial products will be deleted.
  • Help monitor your community. Click "Report Abuse" on any entry that violates these guidelines.
  • This is your forum, with your opinions.

These posts do not reflect the views of the The Free Press Standard or its employees.

 

©2009 The Free Press Standard
Contact the webmaster at: bevans@freepressstandard.com

This website is best viewed in:
Firefox 3 
Letters to the Editor